|
Researchers
at Weill Cornell Medical Center have joined the debate over the
value of mammography, claiming their reanalysis of data shows
a significant benefit for women over age 40.
Danish researchers
recently raised question as to the benefits of mammography performed
on women younger than 40, and an
independent US medical panel, Physician Data Query (PDQ), also
voiced doubt about the benefit of routine mammography after reviewing
the report from the Danish research team.
But Cornell
researchers report finding flaws in the Danish researchers' method
of analysis, especially in their analysis of a 1988 Swedish study
that the Danish investigators claimed was the strongest of the
7 studies they reported on.
Breast cancer
death rates were about the same in screened and unscreened women
in the first 6 years of the Swedish study, but after 6 years the
screened women were significantly less likely to die of breast
cancer, the Cornell group reported in The Lancet.
Women ages
45 to 54 who received mammograms were 30 percent less likely to
die during the 8th to 11th year of follow-up and the risk was
reduced by 55 percent in women ages 55 and older, according to
the report.
The Danish
team, according to the Cornell report, did not account for death
rate reductions with mammography that were apparent over the long
term, not just in the first few years of screening.
"We found
reliable evidence of fatality reduction, apparently substantial
in magnitude," the researchers concluded.
And despite
the current controversy over the benefits of mammography in younger
women, the National Cancer Institute is continuing to recommend
that women get yearly mammograms beginning at age 40.
Other
Sources:The Lancet, AP
|