|
Radiologists
who perform the most mammograms find cancer more frequently and
order fewer biopsies, according to a report published in the Journal
of National Cancer Institute.
The findings
suggest that countries like the United Kingdom where each radiologist
is required to read at least 5,000 mammograms a year achieve better
diagnostic results than countries like the United States, where
only an annual total of 480 mammograms is required.
In the study,
U.S. doctors were divided into three groups: 18 high-volume doctors
who evaluated 301 or more films monthly; 22 medium-volume practitioners
who viewed 101 to 300 films monthly; and 19 low-volume doctors
who saw 100 or fewer films a month.
The U.S. doctors
and a group of British doctors, who typically view more than 400
films per month, were each asked to interpret 60 mammograms, 13
of which contained cancer.
Dr. Laura
Esserman of the University of California said British doctors
had an accuracy rate of 78.5 percent.
She said the
high-volume American doctors had an accuracy rate of 75.6 percent,
medium-volume American radiologists had an accuracy rate of 70.2
percent, and low-volume American doctors had a rate of 64.8 percent.
A lower accuracy,
according to Esserman, meant more patients had unnecessary biopsies
and more cancers went undetected.
"Our finding
that higher volume improves diagnostic performance suggests that
there may be an opportunity to improve quality and efficiency
by re-engineering the organization of U.S. mammography screening
programs," the researchers concluded.
Other
Sources: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
|