|
Young, recently
trained radiologists reading mammogram X-rays are far more likely
to erroneously tell women they might have breast cancer than older
more experienced radiologists, according to researchers at the
University of Washington School of Medicine.
In a study
of interpretations of 8,734 mammograms from 2,169 women over an
eight-year period, the younger radiologists gave two to four times
more false-positive readings than the older radiologists, the
researchers reported in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
The incidences
of false-positive readings among the radiologists ranged from
2.6 percent to 15.9 percent. After adjustments were made for differences
in patient, radiologist, and testing characteristics, the range
of false-positive readings was 3.5 percent to 7.9 percent.
There was
also a wide variation in how often different radiologists noted
masses, calcifications, and other lesions. The radiologists also
differed in their diagnoses and recommendations for additional
screenings and biopsies.
Younger women
who were menopausal and using hormone therapy were more likely
to have a false-positive reading, reported the researchers. Also,
false-positive readings were more likely for women who had mammograms
in the 1990s than those who had mammograms in the 1980s.
"This
increase in false-positive rates may be related to the fear of
malpractice litigation, given the prominence in North America
of malpractice litigation for delayed detection of breast cancer,"
wrote the authors.
The differences
in the rates of false-positive readings could be accounted for
by the age of the radiologist, gender and number of years since
graduating from medical school. Younger and more recently trained
radiologists gave two to four times more false-positive readings
than those who graduated more than 15 years prior to the study.
Researchers
also found that false-positive readings were reduced by about
70 percent when radiologists compared current mammogram images
with past images. This finding suggests that women benefit from
returning to the same screening facility for their screenings.
Other
sources: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
|